SCREENINGORGANISATION EDITIONS
SCREENINGORGANISATION EDITIONS
  • 23
  • 292 438
Herbert A. Simon: Decision is at the Heart of Organization
"I decided that to write about organizations, you had to write about decision-making process, and that was the heart of it." Herbert A. Simon (1998)
Переглядів: 149

Відео

James G.March - Intellectual Roots of the "Garbage Can Model"
Переглядів 19 тис.5 років тому
James March emphasizes two ideas which for him are central for the "garbage can model" of decision-making. The first is the importance of the ways we allocate our attention (at what point in time does an actor consider that a problem has become important enough to pay attention to it and start looking or a solution for it). The second is the instability and basic ambiguity of our preferences as...
North NeoClassicalTheoryCritique
Переглядів 566 років тому
website: screeningorganisation.com/
When Philip Selznick argues against generalization
Переглядів 9677 років тому
For Ph. Selznick, a social scientist should beware of sweeping generalizations and should be sensitive to variation. Website : screeningorganisation.com
Charles Perrow - The cutting edge in organization theory?
Переглядів 4,8 тис.7 років тому
Question: "Would you recommend young people to go into that field right now?" - Perrow: "Absolutely!"
Michael Maccoby - On Social Character
Переглядів 6097 років тому
Michael Maccoby - On Social Character
Nils Brunsson - About the current trend to multiply organizations.
Переглядів 9668 років тому
Website : screeningorganisation.com
Michel Crozier: A study of the American unions - L'étude des syndicats américains (1949-1950)
Переглядів 3,5 тис.11 років тому
More about Michel-Crozier : www.michel-crozier.org Michel Crozier conducted a study with American unions between 1949 and 1950. During this survey,he understood his passion and interest in the field research. S'il est une expérience fondatrice pour Michel Crozier, c'est bien l'étude qu'il a réalisée auprès des syndicats américains entre 1949 et 1950. Il y a découvert son amour et son intérêt po...
William Foote Whyte. From Applied anthropology to Organizational Behaviour
Переглядів 6 тис.12 років тому
William Foote Whyte (1913-2001) began his career as a teacher and researcher in organizational behavior, which took him from the Committee on Human Relations in Industry at the University of Chicago to Cornell University (Ithaca), where he contributed to the creation of the School of Industrial and Labor relations. (Interview by Erhard Friedberg in 1999 (Ithaca).)
Marc Maurice - sociologie du travail et de l'organisation, deux logiques à faire cohabiter
Переглядів 9 тис.12 років тому
screeningorganisation.com/ Marc Maurice explique ici à Erhard Friedberg qui l'interview que, dans les années 50/60, le terme "organisation" n'était pas très utilisé par les sociologues du travail. Il parle de "coupure entre sociologue du travail et sociologue des organisations", chacun, explique-t-il "ayant le sentiment d'appartenir à un monde un peu différent de l'autre." Il ajoute que "sociol...
Michael Maccoby - How to learn to be a good leader?
Переглядів 3,1 тис.12 років тому
Michael Maccoby is a globally recognized expert on leadership who for 35 years has advised leaders in businesses, governments, unions, universities and non profit organizations in more then 30 countries. (Interviewed par Erhard Friedberg, in 2009). He is one of the interviewees of the Multimedia Encyclopedia of Organization. (screeningorganisation.com).
Peter Drucker. A Perceptive Man
Переглядів 8 тис.12 років тому
screeningorganisation.com/ Excerpt of the film "Peter Drucker. A Perceptive Man" Peter Drucker is known as the "guru" of management, a discipline he has more than anybody else contributed to establish. In fact, he is much more than that. With his intellectual roots in the culture of Europe of the beginning XXth century, he has made himself into the often critical, but always insightful observer...
Philip Selznick - Organization and Institution
Переглядів 19 тис.12 років тому
screeningorganisation.com/ Organization and institution are two terms used to analyze a single reality. Philip Selznick gives us his version of what this distinction means // Organisation et institution sont deux termes pour analyser une même réalité. Philip Selznick donne ici sa version de la signification de cette distinction.
David Hickson (Aston group) is not sure we realize how powerful organizations are
Переглядів 1,8 тис.12 років тому
screeningorganisation.com/ In 2004, David Hickson has been interviewed by Erhard Friedberg. He told he was not sure we realize how powerful organizations are, and explained why we have to watch them, to know them, and to study them.
Decision-making is not desirable, it's just inevitable! by PETER DRUCKER (1999)
Переглядів 16 тис.12 років тому
screeningorganisation.com/ Peter Drucker talks about decision-making and explains why he has been training his clients to build into their decision their feedback.
THE ORIGIN OF THE GARGAGE CAN MODEL THEORY, BY JOHAN P. OLSEN
Переглядів 33 тис.12 років тому
THE ORIGIN OF THE GARGAGE CAN MODEL THEORY, BY JOHAN P. OLSEN
WHAT COULD SAY THE ORGANIZATION SOCIOLOGY TO MANAGERS, BY MICHAEL HANNAN
Переглядів 9 тис.12 років тому
WHAT COULD SAY THE ORGANIZATION SOCIOLOGY TO MANAGERS, BY MICHAEL HANNAN
LE SOCIOLOGUE JEAN-DANIEL REYNAUD PARLE DE NEGOCIATION
Переглядів 3,9 тис.12 років тому
LE SOCIOLOGUE JEAN-DANIEL REYNAUD PARLE DE NEGOCIATION
CHRIS ARGYRIS TALKS ABOUT CULTURE AND MANAGEMENT
Переглядів 41 тис.12 років тому
CHRIS ARGYRIS TALKS ABOUT CULTURE AND MANAGEMENT
WHAT IS A NETWORK? BY WALTER (WOODY) POWELL
Переглядів 5 тис.12 років тому
WHAT IS A NETWORK? BY WALTER (WOODY) POWELL
THE CONCEPT OF EMBEDDEDNESS, BY MARK GRANOVETTER
Переглядів 71 тис.12 років тому
THE CONCEPT OF EMBEDDEDNESS, BY MARK GRANOVETTER
A little story about preferences by Nobel Prize in Economics Thomas C. Schelling
Переглядів 1 тис.12 років тому
A little story about preferences by Nobel Prize in Economics Thomas C. Schelling
MICHEL CROZIER RACONTE SON ENQUÊTE AU SEITA
Переглядів 36 тис.13 років тому
MICHEL CROZIER RACONTE SON ENQUÊTE AU SEITA

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @alexanderkurz3621
    @alexanderkurz3621 4 місяці тому

    Is the remainder of the interview available somwhere?

  • @amelsafta6968
    @amelsafta6968 8 місяців тому

    Vu.

  • @Andy_Z905
    @Andy_Z905 9 місяців тому

    If you're here from Minerva you're awesome! <3

    • @Kiwi_DeFruit
      @Kiwi_DeFruit 3 місяці тому

      yeah man, Mcgonagall gave me an assignment on economic sociology... Apparently, she doesn't only teach transfiguration 🤭

  • @1sansremi500
    @1sansremi500 9 місяців тому

    Cette vidéo devrait faire un tabac.

  • @johnthane7837
    @johnthane7837 10 місяців тому

    I read his book, "The Gamesman: The New Corporate Leaders", a few years out of High School while I was working as an X-Ray Technician (Radiological Technologist). It changed my life, and caused me to get a bachelors and masters in Electrical Engineering. I always looked at people from the standpoint of a company man, craftsman, jungle fighter or gamesman. His book was instrumental at shaping my whole life.

  • @johnthane7837
    @johnthane7837 10 місяців тому

    I read his book, "The Gamesman: The New Corporate Leaders", a few years out of High School while I was working as an X-Ray Technician (Radiological Technologist). It changed my life, and caused me to get a bachelors and masters in Electrical Engineering. I always looked at people from the standpoint of a company man, craftsman, jungle fighter or gamesman. His book was instrumental at shaping my whole life.

  • @baptistefournier491
    @baptistefournier491 Рік тому

    Qui aura regardé la vidéo de FXD ici ? Réviser le TP python c'est bien aussi.

  • @SK-le1gm
    @SK-le1gm Рік тому

    what sucks is that i was a sociology student at stanford in 1989-93 and i never learned about any of this 😭

  • @full.d895
    @full.d895 Рік тому

    Who is james G.march ?

  • @shuktikachatterjee
    @shuktikachatterjee 2 роки тому

    Brilliant!!!

  • @user-xc6iu6hc5k
    @user-xc6iu6hc5k 2 роки тому

    「あなたの動画はとても良いですし、メッセージがた

  • @brettknoss486
    @brettknoss486 2 роки тому

    I suspect that a large portion is that networks filter out untrustworthy people. What I want to know is how do minimum wages, and barriers to unpaid internships affect the ability of outsiders to form trust relationships.

  • @muskduh
    @muskduh 2 роки тому

    brilliant

  • @NickAlakersfan
    @NickAlakersfan 2 роки тому

    An Argyris!

  • @shahzadaayub
    @shahzadaayub 2 роки тому

    “The leaders who work most effectively, it seems to me, never say "I." And that's not because they have trained themselves not to say "I." They don't think "I." They think "we"; they think "team." They understand their job to be to make the team function. They accept responsibility and don't sidestep it, but "we" gets the credit. This is what creates trust, what enables you to get the task done.” ― Peter Drucker

  • @segurancacomercio8165
    @segurancacomercio8165 2 роки тому

    Who's the interviewer and when did this interview happened? I'd like to have that information for citation purposes.

  • @henrileroy409
    @henrileroy409 2 роки тому

    Formidable Michel Crozier ! Trop en avance dans les années 70 au milieu d'une société française figée dans des conformismes dogmatiques et obscurantistes. Etudiant, j'adorais ses livres dont l'intelligence valait tous les cours magistraux.

  • @thomasbarnes796
    @thomasbarnes796 3 роки тому

    The book The Organization Man ?

  • @badrfr
    @badrfr 3 роки тому

    Quelle prestance ! RIP

  • @pianogerb
    @pianogerb 3 роки тому

    i have a take-home exam about this next week. This helps a lot with all the incomprehensible online lectures due to covid

  • @IdaOpti
    @IdaOpti 3 роки тому

    well explained.

  • @ardalangharehchaie9519
    @ardalangharehchaie9519 4 роки тому

    His concept? It is Karl Polanyis concept.

    • @Kiwi_DeFruit
      @Kiwi_DeFruit 3 місяці тому

      Yes, Polanyi introduced the concept and wrote about it in the context of a pre-market economy. Granovetter took the concept and thought about the implications of being embedded in a social network, and analysed it so in a context where the relationships have effects on the economic choices, but the context of the economy isn't taken much into consideration because it will vary greatly depending on the social networks someone is embedded in. But is also relatable in the context of a market economy. Karl Polanyi did amazing descriptions of economic liberalism but worked in the frames of other theories, and it is different to observe something and call it a name than to build a theory, so I'd say the concept is Polanyi's but the theory is Granovetter's.

  • @hyacinthars
    @hyacinthars 4 роки тому

    how can i cite this video into my paper?

    • @Jack_Gatsby
      @Jack_Gatsby 4 роки тому

      copy and paste the youtube link, and mention when you retrieve this video (time and date) - in case there is some editing or alteration by the uploader.

  • @rayancharafeddine4982
    @rayancharafeddine4982 4 роки тому

    He called that embededness? Didn't Polanyi call that embededness?

    • @andrewg9457
      @andrewg9457 4 роки тому

      Yes. I’m also confused.

    • @Jack_Gatsby
      @Jack_Gatsby 4 роки тому

      yes he is just extending Polanyi's works.

  • @alexwang3966
    @alexwang3966 4 роки тому

    Monsieur Gal?

  • @pianori11
    @pianori11 5 років тому

    Cute

  • @urban12111
    @urban12111 5 років тому

    my left ear enjoyed selznicks cleverness very much

  • @juanpriego1442
    @juanpriego1442 5 років тому

    I finally understand what he’s saying. I spent hours reading and dissecting his 1985 paper without fully understanding what he meant. This video further clarified his arguments. Yay

  • @patelvidhu4840
    @patelvidhu4840 5 років тому

    Organisation is group of people come together with common goal and work towards achieving that goal. Institution is established organisation that is dedicated to education,public service, care of poor.

    • @slc738
      @slc738 3 роки тому

      Not necessarily

    • @CikguCqin
      @CikguCqin 3 роки тому

      @@slc738 if you dont mind,may i know your opinion sir / madam?

  • @jasonhendra7371
    @jasonhendra7371 6 років тому

    SORGA EVERYONE

  • @legrandtally3458
    @legrandtally3458 6 років тому

    A la Seita non ?

    • @ROMULTIMEDIA
      @ROMULTIMEDIA 6 років тому

      Bonsoir. C'est la m^me entreprise. Mais à l'époque de l'enquête de Michel Crozier, il s'agit encore du SEITA - Service d'exploitation industrielle des tabacs et allumettes - un monopôle d'état; il est renommé la SEITA (Société d'exploitation industrielle des tabacs et allumettes) en 1980. Ensuite, cette société sera privatisée et vendue.

  • @gingakidsgo
    @gingakidsgo 7 років тому

    When your last name is Argyris... Hello...

  • @caniggiasyabil470
    @caniggiasyabil470 7 років тому

    Thanks, his words was more understandable in this video rather than in his 1985's paper

    • @Mirghanii
      @Mirghanii 2 роки тому

      Indeed. His paper could not be more complicated.

  • @Sagunt57
    @Sagunt57 7 років тому

    The question is what is the difference between embeddedness and common sense? It sounds great that "social interaction and social network are important for economic action". Did somebody think differrent from 2000 b.c.?

    • @mpfilgueiras
      @mpfilgueiras 5 років тому

      Actually, governments frequently creates public policies that focus on economic incentives, but ignoring social relationships. So this discussion helps understand behavior that otherwise is labelled as irrrational. That helps to make technology thansference to traditional groups more sucessful, for example. So this discussion is more relevante than it appears

  • @MrAjayapoudel
    @MrAjayapoudel 8 років тому

    Much more useful, and a most watch video!

  • @norwegianstud
    @norwegianstud 8 років тому

    What does he actually mean with the last sentence? He has found Cultural differences on this area as superficial?

    • @brittanyjaleesa
      @brittanyjaleesa 7 років тому

      not meaningful or consequential

    • @mehmetselim9405
      @mehmetselim9405 2 роки тому

      He means that, in whichever (modern) culture you are, even though you call it with a different name, the actual behavior are very similar. As he stated, when dealing with situations that is potentially upsetting to the others, you craft an action strategy in such a way that so that the other party cannot hold you responsible if/when he or she gets upset. It is the same in the USA or Japan, Israel or Turkiye. The differences are superficial. For example: when you act in the same way that you are criticizing in others and this is pointed to you, you can blame others or the culture or you can say that you have to do that in order to help others. Another example: Instead of telling your employee : - John, your being late leads me to think that you are irresponsible with your time but I may be missing something. What is the story here and how do you see things? (since this makes you vulnerable to counter-view, dis-confirming data or alternative explanation thus being wrong with your conclusion) you say: - John your being irresponsible affects all the others in the team. You either shape-up or else..(we established the fact that you are irresponsible and that is out of discussion. What you need to to is accept my conclusion (that you are irresponsible) and act accordingly. I believe this kind of behavior as ubiquitous. What you think?

    • @vincentjrmgbemena4958
      @vincentjrmgbemena4958 4 місяці тому

      @@mehmetselim9405 I am just reading this comment now and found it soo helpful, Thank you

  • @bwarsavage
    @bwarsavage 9 років тому

    There are 2 parts to this. (1) If you don't know, you DON'T know. the (2) Most people don't know what they don't know. Isn't 2 an oxymoron. How do you approach finding out what you don't know? There is also is an aspect that you don't mention which is your premise. An organization exists in a context.

  • @fransvanwamel7856
    @fransvanwamel7856 10 років тому

    thanks Chris for your groundwork on this amazing topic of Action Learning. I am honoured to have been your scholar.

  • @madameyuna
    @madameyuna 10 років тому

    Merci Consciencevraie, je l'ai lu, ça m'a redonné un second souffle pour apprécier un peu plus facilement cet écrit.

  • @wechellynrochagomes4361
    @wechellynrochagomes4361 11 років тому

    The video helped me a lot here in Brazil with a college work on the subject, thanks!

  • @rsaylors
    @rsaylors 11 років тому

    Your team has spent the better part of a decade re-creating guanxi and social capital theories? What Granovetter is talking about (published in 05) is updating TCE with his network-ties theories (which actually makes sense); Though now it reads like a mid-range theory built out of Structuration Theory. IMHO Describing novel ontologies is the future Sandberg & Tsoukas (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338-360.

  • @slabbedask1
    @slabbedask1 11 років тому

    Gargage or garbage?

  • @BellaBella313
    @BellaBella313 11 років тому

    :)

  • @sfeverton
    @sfeverton 12 років тому

    You probably should check out his 1985 article, "Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness" then.

  • @robpeters7185
    @robpeters7185 12 років тому

    Professor Granovetter seems to be referring to a concept my team has been working on since 2005. Taking into account the quality of social relationships in business transactions & interactions by capturing and measuring Relationship Capital (RC).

    • @mufsinpp1278
      @mufsinpp1278 6 років тому

      As far as my understanding goes Prof. Granovetter developed his idea of embeddedness in 1980s

  • @mingtaoshi
    @mingtaoshi 12 років тому

    Insightful